On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Tom Kistner wrote: > > I'm with Tony here: You already can send a username to spamd. Changes in rule > treatment should be implemented in spamd, using the submitted username as the > key.
I wasn't thinking of anything user-dependent - and Ian said that he doesn't want to do that because of the performance implications. Instead, SpamAssassin should be able to work out that this message is a local submission and not apply RBL checks to it. SA already has some of this logic in the notfirsthop stuff for remote submissions; it just needs to be extended. Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
