"Clive McDowell" wrote: > > > If it gets past this ACL, the message was too big to be scanned, or > > > it's score was below SpamAssassin::Conf::required_hits. > > You can use > > > this data as the basis for further decisions. > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > thanks for pointing this out. I forgot to mention this. Of > > course this is much more easy, but only works if you want to > > deny based on SA's result. If you want to tag the mail for > > further processing, you have to stick with the long version I > > posted, because defers in warn acl statements pass the > > control flow to the next acl statement. > > Patrick, > > exactly so. Our user base here is paranoid about losing genuine > messages so we only reject on very high spam scores (>100). The rest
So then set required_score to 100 is SA's config. Ian -- Ian Freislich -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
