Felix Schwarz wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Just looking for a quick opinion - who likes DSPAM?
Me.
I switched ca. 9 months ago when SpamAssassin failed to detect more
and more spam (had around 5-10 false negatives in a week with ca. 3500
mails/week). DSPAM is far better (2-3 false negatives) and produces
less false positives especially for unknown senders/uncommon subjects.
DSPAM classified messages as ham which I would have deleted without
further notice because they look so spammy but in reality they WERE ham.
DSPAM needed quite a big training corpus for me (10000 ham/spam mails)
and you should test it thoroughly as it rewrites mails (signature in
the body) and imho these routines could be implemented more
conservatively/carefully. For example in 3.4 it destroyed subjects
with umlauts and S/MIME signed messages. While the first bug was fixed
in 3.4, S/MIME signed message were not (at least until 3.4.7, don't
know newer versions).
fs
Can it be made to not modify the message at all or to just add one
header line with a score? I just want to use it to get a second opinion
and then process the scroe with Spamassassin.
--
Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
