Jeremiah Foster wrote: >> I'd really like to see some examples. > I appreciate your differing point of view, I would like to point you > to the mail archives however and ask you again if you feel that > perhaps competent people have not been treated rather rudely.
Usually, the people making claims are to prove them. Anyway, I looked a little through the archives, and found nothing. No surprise for me, I'm not on this list since yesterday. Maybe we have a different perception or trigger level regarding "rudeness". That's why I asked for examples. >> Even if it were true, how should this be different on a >> spin-off list? Anyway, this is not exim-cuddle. > No it is certainly not exim-cuddle. But nor is it > exim-with-copious-amounts-of-misplaced-anger-aimed-at-people-who-don't- > read-the-RFCs. Surely not. My point is, this is a technical list. People raise topics, other people follow up, and I'd say that most of the time the former are satisfied. So I really don't know what's the problem. > see great good in more people being able to understand it. If exim4 > were the main MTA on the internet; I disagree in every single point. I really like Exim, but it's not the Holy Grail. Exim covers a wide range of requirements, but so do other MTAs. > I think exim can be run by nearly anyone, but it takes patience and Probably, but MTAs are not one-size-fits-all. Many poeple only need a tiny part of Exim's features, so it makes no sense for them to spend all this time to learn how to use them. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
