On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 14:05 +0100, Mrten wrote: > This is from a bounce message, known to be from a message 12212859 > bytes in size (the message that bounced gets sent to two people via an > alias, i got it quite ok, but the other guy didnt):
who sent what? obfuscating the log makes it very hard to understand what's happening. what is your message_size_limit set to? what kind of OS are you running? is Exim compiled as a 64-bit application? > ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ > ------ The body of the message is 457396849191571 characters long; only the > first > ------ -1073748576 or so are included here. > > 8< - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >8 how much was actually included? > It seems that 457.396.849.191.571 bytes is rather excessive, and the > negative number of bytes seems weird as well :) the positive number is 416 TiB + 12036755 bytes, which sounds like a reasonable number plus garbage in the top 32 bits. the negative number is 1 GiB + 6752 bytes, which is weirder. > I've checked the source a bit (src/transports/autoreply.c) and this > bug seems weird as it occurs in pretty trivial fprintf(). using the right format character for a given type is unfortunately non-trivial. > Could it be > that there is something wrong with my build environment (which > wouldn't surprise me at *all*)? if it wouldn't surprise you, perhaps you should've included some details about it :-) -- Kjetil T. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
