Tony Godshall wrote: > > Well, it is in DNS and it does have SPF records. I guess I'll > go dig up the specifics to your vague recommendation if it > becomes a problem beyond just the one ISP. Thanks for the > pointer, though.
You're not going to convince many people here of your legitimacy by publishing SPF records. The rough consensus on this list seems to be best represented by http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html . Ok, maybe consensus isn't the right word, but it certainly seems to be the majority opinion. Publishing SPF records seems to be one of the first things a spammer does when they acquire a new domain. - Marc -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
