Tony Godshall wrote:
*trimmed*
(hacker sez)
Getting them to fix the PTR may not be all that likely:
Selected quotes from AlamedaNet's Terms of Service...
I'll check to see if these are the same terms for the small
business static-ip version, but you have a good point.
...
Would all those who wish to run an MTA on 'broadband', static IP or
otherwise, kindly read their own ToS first?
...
'nuf said.
NNNN
Thank you for the pointers. I am suitably chastised.
'Chastised' was not the intent. 'Made aware' was.
Glad to have gotten around the 'pre-conceived notion' barrier.
Better to have a 'heads up' from a fellow-traveler than a disconnect
and/or legalese threats from
an upstream that may not be easily replaceable. That can be seriously
inconvenient.
Most of us depend on those broadband tail-circuits. Too few of use read
the ToS. ;-)
My mail servers, BTW, sit in a leased rack in a proper data center.
'Traceroute' if you wish.
I don't run any 'service' from the workstation (in Hong Kong last week,
Bangkok this week, and the USA next week)
It pays to keep stuff in/on its proper 'box'.
HTH,
Bill
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
