Hi, Riemer Palstra wrote:
>> 2) If I put malware = */defer_ok in my check data ACL, will that >> accept the mail and relay it out to the world, or will it accept and >> queue until clam is back up. The latter would be better, but I'm not >> sure if it is possible. > > The first. Consider putting a second scanner in the chain if you > *really* don't want a message to be sent out to the world without any > type of scanning. Can't we detect if the scanner failed or not? (I have a suspicion.) If not; wouldn't it make sense to have a variable that indicates this? (Something like $malware_failed or so. Something that can be used as to add a header as a warning, try another scanner instead, ...) With defer_ok we can't add a header at a later stage that tells if the scan was successful... we can only be sure if there was indeed malware detected, if malware_name is defined, right? Paul -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
