> Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> http://www.exim-users.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2825&postcount=9
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > > And with only very moderate obfuscation here: > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user My point was that Ian's address, the one he's so anxious to protect from web publication, already appears en clair in the message I linked above (thanks to another poster's un-trimmed top posting). Gmane.org doesn't do that, but it only takes one such archive to prove that archive obfuscation as a tool for spam reduction is a fool's errand. - Marc -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
