On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Marc Haber wrote:

> >> Exim will believe the information from the additional section, and try
> >> delivering there.
> >
> >Aarrgghh!! Yes, that does explain it. Thank you for tracking this one 
> >down. 
> 
> Have you already decided on how to fix this in exim? As this is a bad
> bug, we'd need to backport the fix to exim 4.50 as well for inclusion
> in the next Debian point release. I'd greatly appreciate a patch.

It seems that the only sensible thing to do is to ignore the additional 
section completely, and that is what I plan to do. I have not decided 
whether to be more elaborate than that or not, but I suspect that it is 
not worth doing anything. Busy systems should have "nearby" DNS servers 
so that the additional queries will be cheap; for unbusy systems it 
won't matter much.

I have not looked at the source, but the patch should be trivial; just 
delete (or skip) the code that processes the additional section. 

I do not expect to actually look at this for one or two or three weeks.
I have been on vacation over Christmas and New Year, and this week is a
short one in which I want to do documentation work. Thereafter I am
planning on a PCRE blitz, which will probably last most of January.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to