--On 28 December 2005 23:02:02 +0000 Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Alan J. Flavell wrote:
Now, you'd be entitled to say they ought to have used role addresses,
which could be switched to the people who are currently performing
these duties. But we have not pursued that policy aggressively, and
many of my users know that I am the (normal) person to carry out the
actions, so they address me personally.
Even if you provide role addresses people will disregard them and address
email personally when they should not.
We *have* pursued the policy aggressively. Our prospectuses now contain
ONLY role based addresses, for example. People do disregard role based
addresses to a large extent, but this does avoid the problem that printed
material is distributed with addresses that are already incorrect. So, the
policy is helpful, but not a complete solution.
--
Ian Eiloart
Servers Team
Sussex University ITS
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
