On 1/17/06, Jakob Hirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sounds like a problem with saslauthd's interface to pam. stracing the > saslauthd should reveal the problem, as somebody else pointed out.
I just realized I started saslauthd with the argument '-a shadow'...this completely bypasses PAM and goes for the shadow file directly. Problem solved :) Sam -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
