On Thursday 19 January 2006 18:26, John W. Baxter wrote:
> I'm not sure recipient callout verification is really appropriate here.
> Aside from spammers trying to sneak in (lots of activity), the reason a
> message is presented to the backup MX is that the primary MX is
> unavailable.
Shucks. Yep -- good call.
> It may well be better for there not to be a backup MX, unless the primary
> is protecting against multi-day outages.
Hmm. The admin is looking for off-site MX backup specifically because he
is concerned about his single connection reliability.
> Of course, that may interfere with a business plan.
Thankfully, no. In this case this is a person providing a community
resource and not part of a business.
Thanks for pointing out the callout verification problem, John.
- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
