Philip Hazel wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Marc Sherman wrote: > >> You should set the VERP return path in your verp_outbound_router >> using errors_to, instead of using return_path on the verp_smtp >> transport. >> >> Philip, should the docs in chapter 44.3 be changed to suggest this? > > Noted to think about next time the docs are revised. >
This may sound slightly ungracious after helping me solve my problem, but it occurred to me that as you have to include the errors_to in the router, yet set the return_path in the transport, you wind up having to compose the same VERP address in two different places. Is there a way of avoiding having to maintain identical code in two different places? Michael -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
