On 17/02/06, W B Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Bolton wrote: > > > Peter Bowyer wrote: > > > >> On 17/02/06, Nigel Metheringham > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:29 +0000, Chris Bolton wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=7.5 > >>>> tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,---^^^--- > >>>> > >>>> HTML_90_100,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_COMMENT,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY, > >>>> MISSING_SUBJECT autolearn=no version=3.1.0 > >>>>
> So long as you have 'autolearn=no' you might even want to drop > the BAYES completely. Or at least it's presence in the > announcement string. autolearn=no means that this message wasn't either hammy enough or spammy enough to be worth learning from (thresholds adjustable in the SA config). autolearn=disabled would mean it's turned off. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 1296 768003 VoIP: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] VoIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FWD: **275*5048707000 VoipTalk: **473*5048707000 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
