-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>One thing that would be nice in the SMTP protocol is a redirect response >so that when a message came in you could tell the sending server to go >to a different host to deliver the email. See #3.2 in RFC821 and then the careful commentary about it in #3.4 of RFC2821.... ie: you consider the use of 251 or 551 You will probably very promptly conclude it's a waste of time because no-one ever takes any notice of it, but YMMV. >That way you could dynamically >point mail to spam filters which would then clean the email and send it >back. ROFL >Wonder what it would take to get the SMTP protocol changed? You should start by becoming emperor of the world, after that it shouldn't take more than a few decades >It >could be an extremely useful feature. It's there already, no-one uses it, go figure! - -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBRAB2y5oAxkTY1oPiEQL0swCghZyuXVMwFb7YcNIzYBW72HsYknkAoID1 W15P72jzlJhdar3eO7I8tOYE =Ctjp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
