Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But the payment of money isn't a good way to distinguish real email from > spam. It quashes free speech
free speech is quashed because of what? i don't get under what premise you've had came to this conclusion. or is it a platitude? *snicker* free speech includes a right not to listen, if not interested. or am i missing something? > I also tend to protest and kind of attempt to take what is essentially > an open public worldwide network and turn it into a private corporate > fascist controlled network. does it introduce any false positives not present in their spam filtering system before this whole idea was introduced? > So my suggestion is a gentle way of expressing my concerns to AOL in > their log files. #ifdef FLAME better yet, you could make these DEFER messages multiline, make them appear as banner(6) or just teergrube them. #endif /* FLAME */ i don't *like* this idea at all, i think that they're avoiding the real problem and not just misdirecting their efforts, but also trying to make a profit out of it. but so are you (except for that 'money' part), with these 'corporate fascist' and 'quashes free speech' comments.
pgpOydEl2uWLS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
