Stephen Gran wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:02:41AM +0200, Angel Tsankov said:
Stephen Gran wrote:
I am not sure how one could know, given the amount of information
presented, but I don't believe that's the problem. Did the second MTA
get a 5xx at delivery time?
I think the second MTA got this:
smx.abv.bg: 552 sorry, that message size exceeds my databytes limit
So it got an smtp time reject from one of the secondary MX's. Perhaps
they are configured differently?
If you mean that pmx.abv.bg and smx.abv.bg might be configured differently then
I should say that this could hardly be the case.
This seems to point at it not being
a bounce issue. As they don't offer SIZE to EHLO, it's not trivially
testable without trying to send an email.
Sending and e-mail is not a problem except if you mean sending it "manually",
i.e. as you have suggested below.
Did it get a bounce message later? Do you
have exim configured to reject bounces for some reason?
How do I check if exim is configured to reject bounces?
Try a debug session - exim -bh ip.ad.dr.ess and then go through the smtp
session:
helo pmx.abv.bg
mail from:<>
rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
quit
Could you be more precise? What results should I expect?
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
