> > > Rejecting mail with non-empty reverse-path to your signed addresses > > > isn't really that important > > It's in *your* config my friend! :P > I know. It's not a problem for _me_ --
hah :) got me ;) > An old version of my config, working around bugs in an old version of > Exim. You don't need the 'verifying sender' hack any more. My current > config is at http://david.woodhou.se/eximconf/include/routers-ses Ah right. Didn't really know that page existed. I use infradead.org/rpr.html which then has the older version. I'll check out that url. > > I'm just curious as to what return path addresses are supposed to be > > used for. How the opinions on that are set... > For bounces and autoresponses and, by extension, for sender verification > callouts. With null senders :P But thanks, i know enough now. We can kill this offtopic thread. :) I'll relax my settings and adopt things from your new config, David. Thanks alot all! With regards, Sander. -- | There is always one more imbecile than you counted on. | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
