Phil Pennock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2006-03-22 at 15:02 +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: >> Does this looks good enough/reliable for you ? > > The only serious problem is that any Perl going into production use > really should have warnings turned on. warnings + strict. And taint, > if dealing with untrusted data. This especially applies when you're > overriding an error condition to mask a problem!
> I'll also supply the decode logic I typically, which will help you see > exactly what happened in procmail, so you can get precise logs of all > failures. Thanks for the advice and the script, its a really good lesson of perl usage! Best regards, -- Nicolas -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
