On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, David Saez Padros wrote: > yes, but in this particular case this does not matter as the acl is > only used for informational purposes. Maybe having something like > control = no_defer or +ignore_defer could be useful in that situations > where is more important to accept messages when some non critical acl > defers than the informational function of that acl.
We already have +include_unknown as well as +ignore_unknown, so I suppose we would add +accept_defer or +ignore_defer. I have put something on the WishList, where I see there are a number of items that refer to defers of various kinds. But this is all too late now for 4.61. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
