Avleen Vig wrote:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 04:00:41PM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
I suspect you are correct, and tcpdump may show it clearly.
I don't think that should be the case.
If Daniel is sending packets larger than 400 bytes, it is his OWN router
that should complain that the packets are too large before they leave
the network.
By the time they get to the gmail servers, they should either be <= 400
bytes, or they shouldn't leave his router.
Still worth a look.
Keeping in mind that a session should be two-way, what we saw in
our case was an imbalance, wherein the session fired up, but
then the distant end began to slow down and finally time-out.
Grant - in our case, we were looking at *incoming* traffic,
where the balance of packets was expected to be heaviest inbound.
His situation is, of course, the reverse.
- But I doubt gmail techs would run any sort of analysis, so..
Bill
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
