On Sun, 7 May 2006, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > My first reaction was "Yuck!". Looks like a really ugly hack to me, > overloading the SRV RR fields and all. SPF at least uses TXT RR's, which > has no particular semantics. On the other hand there won't be any > collisions, as smtp isn't an existing IP protocol. Any other thoughts?
CSA uses SRV records because that means that in the majority of cases a conformance check only requires one DNS lookup. SPF usually requires many DNS lookups, and then gives you the wrong answer. Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
