On Sat, 13 May 2006, W B Hacker wrote: > > I think it would be a Very Good Idea to include not one, but > several (three?) default / example submission authenticators,
Is there a third authentication mechanism that is as common as PLAIN and LOGIN? Perhaps SPA if you are using Exim in a Windows environment, but I would prefer to have a sample working config from someone who uses it for real before I put it in the default config. > at least one TLS-enabled over port 587. My example plaintext authenticators require TLS. Port numbers are an orthogonal issue, but I also included some comments about message submission on alternate ports. Do you have any specific suggestions for my proposed patch? Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
