Alastair Campbell wrote: > John W. Baxter wrote: > > As part of my long-running campaign to get rid of the catchall in my domain, > > I have now changed the settings so that catchall mail goes to the cleverly > > named "invalid" mailbox (which I read once or twice a week in an MUA devoted > > to the purpose). > > If Jacob's idea doesn't work out I'll have to do something like that, > but it's only bounces I have a problem with, spam itself is dealt with > effectively.
Why not just block bounces to the catchall? -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals Got Gas??? -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
