am 2006-06-01 13:00 schrieb Philip Hazel: > On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Peter Velan wrote: > >> First I tried -oMai but without -f it does not work at all. > > That is odd. From looking at the code, -oMai should always work for a > trusted caller (and be ignored for a non-trusted caller).
Uuh, I'm not sure, but may be I had "-oMai" AND "-f <>" in the call. But definitelly, the mail was not send and there was nothing in main-, reject- or panic-log. >> Next I tried -f - not with my original problem in mind, but to give >> the message a real envelope-from. > > Hmm. If you didn't mention -f before, it should have already had a real > envelope from. (I recall your logs showed <> which implies that > *something* had specified a null sender. This has to be either -f or > MAIL FROM:<> using -bs.) You are right: I had -f <> in the call which produced the logs in my OP. Then, my hope was, that w/out giving specifically a null sender the $authenticated_id will not be empty. >> May I asume that -oMai requires -f to work properly? > > It shouldn't. Ok. Peter -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
