Tim Jackson wrote: > You are, of course, right. I must be going completely barking. Yes, > those are in a router. The key point still stands though, that it is > cleaner than some other proposed solutions as a) it's simple and b) it's > all in one place.
That's only true if all the mail you want the header to be modified is handled by a single router. But depending on your setup, this could also be an advantage because it's more flexible (but would probably better in a transport). -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
