On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, W B Hacker wrote: > From: W B Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: exim users <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:47:38 +0800 > Subject: Re: [exim] netzero forgeries? > > Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > [Apologies for missing References headers; I've just subscribed and I'm > > replying to a message seen on the web archive] > > > > Another interesting data point: > > > > I've been large numbers of HELOs from netzero.com, but with a twist.
... > They are looking for the most gullible, i.e. WinUsers in the US. > > The rest of the world is a bit more discerning less trusting - > about most things in life. Most of the ones I've seen have been fingered by the RBLs I use. For example, here's one for me that was hit by the JANET subscription to MAPS: 2006-06-15 15:38:55 H=(netzero.com) [220.171.78.157] I=[138.38.32.23]:25 F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rejected RCPT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 220.171.78.157 is listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.ja.net 220.171.78.157 appears to be registed to a Chinese network. -- Dennis Davis, BUCS, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +44 1225 386101 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
