Hi !! >> then the solution could be to do the virus scan at the transport ... > > yes, but how?
define one transport that scans the email and reinjects it again in exim for final delivery (as amavis and other programs do) Myabe you could take a look a amavis: http://www.amavis.org/ > And what happens, when a virus is found? Can I define a > bounce message then? is really a bad idea to send a bounce message for viruses, almost all sender addresses are faked and you get the risk to be blacklisted by other servers. >> but i also remember that there was a recent topic talking about a way to >> know at smtp time where each address will be routed (by setting >> address_data) > > In our case this wouldn't help. To know which transport will be used > doesn't tell if there is a virus scan required after a forwarding (as I > tried to describe in the forwarding-example). sorry, i mean routers not transports > A (very cloddy) way would > be to do no interal forwardings/redirects, that's what verify recipient does > but configure exim to deliver > forwardings per smtp to itself so that the acl_check_data rule would > apply. But I don't know if this is possible to configure, I think exim > will grump that target and sender host is the same. try amavis -- Best regards ... ---------------------------------------------------------------- David Saez Padros http://www.ols.es On-Line Services 2000 S.L. e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pintor Vayreda 1 telf +34 902 50 29 75 08184 Palau-Solita i Plegamans movil +34 670 35 27 53 ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
