--On 19 June 2006 10:23:38 +0100 Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --On 17 June 2006 19:18:14 -0400 Kelley Reynolds > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> For those of you interested, I've outlined a method for OS >> Fingerprinting E-mail using FreeBSD and PF .. the details can be found >> at >> >> http://blog.insidesystems.net/articles/2006/06/06/OS-Fingerprinting- >> Email >> > > Er, that's: > > <http://blog.insidesystems.net/articles/2006/06/06/OS-Fingerprinting-Email> And, it isn't terribly exciting. The most important fact here is that you can't obtain a fingerprint for 70% of incoming mail, and most of the rest identifies as from AIX hosts. Oh, yes Contiki is an operating system <http://www.sics.se/~adam/contiki/> One question that the article looks at is whether much of our spam comes from "networks of infected zombie Windows machines" but, it doesn't seem to look at the question of whether the OS identified is that of the originating host, or some ISP router or NAT host. I don't know enough about routing to make a guess about that. > -- > Ian Eiloart > IT Services, University of Sussex -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
