I am sorry, I receive exim list in digests and didn't see the fix with the ?<...>? someone else posted before. So yes, it could have been fixed yesterday :)
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:17:00 +0100 (BST) Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Renaud Allard wrote: > > > Well, as it seems the rewriting doesn't take place before the syntax check > > Here is the log with -d+all > > > > rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 09:35:55 23708 SMTP<< rcpt to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 09:35:55 23708 expanding: \N^(.*)@tmn_00.telchoi.alcatel.be$\N > > I thought we fixed this yesterday? You need to include the < and > in > the pattern. And in the test you have given, you might need to include a > leading space as well. Note that the standard for the RCPT command is > > RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > with no space between : and < (though many programs, including Exim, > allow it). I can't remember whether the S rewriter strips leading > whitespace or not. > > -- > Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service > Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- .O. ..O OOO PGP key: http://www.llorien.org/gnupg/key.pub Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. - Albert Einstein
pgpKqVNjupLF2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
