>The external mail server, 209.42.34.104 is refusing the null sender.
 >Simple test:
 >
 >$ telnet mail.idonails.com 25
 >Trying 209.42.34.104...
 >Connected to static.user104.209.42.34.dsli.com.
 >Escape character is '^]'.
 >220 idonails.com ESMTP MDaemon 6.8.4; Sat, 01 Jul 2006 09:07:15 -0400
 >HELO elara
 >250 idonails.com Hello elara, pleased to meet you
 >MAIL FROM: <>
 >550 Sorry, this server is configured to refuse this sort of mail (to
 >combat the SPAM problem)
 >
 >Badly configured mail server on the other end.  Exim uses the null
 >sender for sender verification checks and so this will automatically
 >fail them all.
 >

OK gotcha on that.. I sent that info to the person who maintains her mail 
server..

Reading your comments 3 times now.. can my Exim be configured to not send a 
null to verify so this won;t happen?? I might think there are other mail 
servers that also are refusing on the same basis???   But could this also 
could be the way these 2 forms are handled on my server.. could these forms 
be configured better to not be sending a null user?? Nothing has changed on 
the forms - either her registration or the orders from her cgi based cart - 
since the move.. here are the headers from one of her orders and a 
registration on the new server (sorry I do not have access to one off the 
VPS to compare)

Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:00:10 -0400
Received: from idonails by server.wwwebserv.com with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.52)
        id 1FvodN-0004a3-JW
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:00:10 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.2 (2006-05-25) on
        server.wwwebserv.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-51.0 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,COMM_ORDER,
        FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,NO_REAL_NAME,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham
        version=3.1.2
Received: from idonails by server.wwwebserv.com with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1FvodN-0004Zw-GL
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:00:09 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: The Supply Source Order - 200961421 - Burkes
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:00:09 -0400

and one from the registration (again a simple cgi form)

X-Persona: <idonail>
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:26:31 -0400
Received: from idonails by server.wwwebserv.com with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.52)
        id 1Fvrr4-0004mE-Re
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:26:31 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.2 (2006-05-25) on
        server.wwwebserv.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS,
        FROM_NO_LOWER,NO_RELAYS,REPTO_QUOTE_YAHOO autolearn=no version=3.1.2
Received: from idonails by server.wwwebserv.com with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1Fvrr4-0004m7-NM
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:26:30 -0400
From: "BETHANY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "BETHANY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: idonails registration
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:26:30 -0400



 >> I see it as server.wwwebserv.com refusing the mail because it can not
 >> verify [EMAIL PROTECTED] - server.wwwebserv.com thinking
 >> because idonails is a local domain, checking locally to not find a
 >> user of supplysource1. If this is correct, then it is my problem and
 >> I need to resolve this.
 >
 >Not quite - it can't verify it, not because of an incorrect setup on
 >your side, but the remote host.
 >
 >> mail    14400   IN      A       209.42.34.104
 >> www     14400   IN      CNAME   idonails.com.
 >> ftp     14400   IN      A       64.79.202.138
 >> mail.idonails.com       14400   IN      MX      0       209.42.34.104
 >
 >Incidentally, that probably isn't doing what you expect.  You've added
 >an MX record for "mail.idonails.com.idonails.com".  You should change
 >it to this really:
 >
 >mail       14400   IN      MX      0       209.42.34.104
 >
 >The reason is that there should be a full stop on the end of the name
 >if it's fully qualified.


 >Actually, it should be:
 >
 >mail       14400   IN      MX      0       mail.idonails.com.
 >
 >RHS of an MX record "MUST" be a host name

Thanks gentlemen.. I will make this change today..

Regards,
Debbie  ^v^  ^o^  //\o/\\ ^o^  ^v^  Webmaster - System Admin


[EMAIL PROTECTED] (AOL, CS or AIM NailGdsss - MSN Nailgodess)
WWWeb Services, Ronkonkoma, NY
631-981-1273  fax 631-981-7557
http://www.beautytech.com & http://www.beautytech.INFO
     for Professionals             for Consumers


-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to