Odhiambo Washington wrote: > * On 04/07/06 20:35 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote: > | Odhiambo Washington wrote: > | >>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 04 19:57:06 2006 > | > Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:57:06 +0300 > | > Received: from acaen-251-1-97-4.w86-205.abo.wanadoo.fr ([86.205.243.4]) > | > by ns2.wananchi.com with esmtp (Exim 4.62 #0 (FreeBSD > 4.11-STABLE)) > | > id 1FxoCv-0003Gc-1j > | > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:57:06 +0300 > | > | Hmm. On wanna-doo-doo, in France. Notorious. > | > | Only actually on spamcop, among the major dnsbl's - but do > | you have enough business with France to not block .fr wholesale, and > | whitelist as needed? > | > | Once you get annoyed enough, many ISPs and several whole > | countries can be usefully dealt with that way. > > We're an ISP, so you don't get "annoyed" too easily ;) > We have enough business with earth (the whole world) so we must only > deal with what can be dealt with without excess collateral damage. > > > cheers > - wash
No need to block all of France. Or even all of wannadoo. That particular source IP is in a block allocated portable, and shows no PTR record. The HELO/EHLO is probably broken also. I suspect it will have exhibited other protocol violations. Why would you allow a zombie or LinWin hobbyist to connect on port 25 as a peer MX? Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
