On 05/07/06, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand that as software grows it not always harmonious. Sometimes > it's worth going back and rewriting things so that you get back to a > solid foundation so that when you need to add new features you aren't > fighting old code. I used to go through building phases where I added > new capabilities and then cleanup phases where I went back and did > things right so that the next time I wanted to build I had a solid > foundation in code.
How big an install base did you have? How many independent users had downloaded the code anonymously? And was this code in the default install of a popular Linux distribution? However much it might make sense from a pure architecture perspective (and I agree that it probably does), real-world deployed base issues tend to raise the bar somewhat. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
