On 7/12/06, Dominic Cleal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The difference seems to be in how they determine whether authentication > was successful or not. > > Juha's config tests for the string "FAIL\n" - if it returns that, then > authentication fails but otherwise, on any other value, it will be > successful. If the authdaemon syntax changed, or some other fault > occurred, I would guess that it's possible the daemon could return a > different value upon a failure, making the expansion evaluate to 'yes'. > > The wiki config assumes the keyword=value syntax and tests for the > 'address' keyword. If that's present, then it's assumed to be > successful, otherwise it fails. >
Thanks Dominic and Jakob. Will test with Jakob's config to see if it works with multiple domains - have a vague recollection that's the reason I used a simpler test for the authentication. -- Juha -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
