Michael Johnson wrote: > On Jul 14, 2006, at 7:45 AM, Marc Sherman wrote: > > >>Michael Johnson wrote: >>
*snip* > >>>What about the core problem? I went into the scores.cf file of SA >>>and changed the blacklist to 50 from 100. Is the inability to reject >>>a score over 100 a bug or a feature? >> >>It's something that you're the only person to report. I suspect >>there's >>something going on that your not noticing. Can you produce exim debug >>output from a test message that scores higher than 100 in SA? > > > It's happening on several accounts, but only those which get the > Pottery Barn spam. On its own merits, the PB messages gets a score > of about 2 or 3. That's not enough for my setup to reject it. I > don't do that until 4. But, with the blacklist being 100, that score > gets bumped to 102 or 103. I don't currently have a message from PB, > but I'll probably get one today or tomorrow. I'll send the > appropriate headers. > > -Michael We use integer scores and comparisons in Exim acl's that range from 0 to over 1000 without a problem. That said, these are protocol-violation or local BL hits, not run through SA, so would be indifferent to any upper-bounds or math limits in SA. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
