Philip Hazel wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Peter D. Gray wrote: > > > Hmmmmmmmm.... would it be possible to simply rename the -H files > > to -F when a message is frozen. That way it would be fast > > to ignore frozen messages without the overhead of an open > > and read. > > That is an interesting idea, which I have noted. However, it isn't all > that simple because everything that scans queues, including eximon, exim > -bp, etc, would have to be upgraded to understand it. > > Even if that were done, though, there is a flaw in this plan. Remember > that *sometimes* when a frozen message is encountered, it *is* processed > as a result of auto_that, timeout_frozen_after, and > ignore_bounce_errors_after. Something other than a simple -F would be > needed to encode the time of freezing.
Just a thought, you could process frozen messages after processing all non-frozen messages. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals Got Gas??? -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
