Chris Blaise wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Balzer >>Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:03 AM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates >> >> >>I can confirm this MSN behavior, one recipient here was at >>the end of some 8.8MB mail which must have been a >>specifically crafted mime/mail bomb. >>It took SA 160s (98s w/o Bayes) to handle it, while usually >>mails in this size range take less than 5 seconds (including >>all DNS/DCC/Razor checks). >>Note the 98s up there, which means that they're not even >>waiting 2 minutes. > > > In my case, the messages are only about 5kB each! > > I can confirm (based on Tony's recommendation to enable more logging > options) that the remote server is indeed dropping the connection. > > Clearly the "problem" on my end is that the machine in question is > only 64MB
64 MB? That implies an older, slower, memory technology, CPU, bus, etc. than can easily be purchased nowadays. Unless your platform is a PDA or cell-phone... > and doing Sophos, ClamAV, and SpamAssassin scanning. > > Based on an issue I was seeing last month with Outlook clients and > low timeouts, I came up with a solution to detect duplicates (using Perl and > SQLite). I'll just adjust that to work for this. > > Chris > > Ouch! ... and might one expect there is a GUI and perhaps multimedia running as well? Perhaps you should be posting on Alt.Sex.Bondage? ;-) Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
