On 8/9/06 1:09 AM, "Philip Hazel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ah, I wasn't aware the RFCs would differentiate, nor did I look it up >> myself. > > They don't (as far as I know). My belief is that nobody was thinking of > callouts when the RFCs were written. In several pages of Google output, the only relevant thing I find is dated May 2006, and is informational RFC 4496, Open Pluggable Edge Services (OPES) SMTP Use Cases. And that appears at a glance to have nothing to do with Exim's sender verification callouts (which I don't use for various reasons), although OPES itself looks interesting, among consenting machines. --John -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
