I'm also wondering about the "all or nothing" point of view. If you have a SPF record on the email coming in you check it, if there isn't you don't and still accept the email? or it gets marked as spam?
Jason Cawood > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [exim] Exim4 + greylistd + spf > From: "Chris Blaise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, August 17, 2006 9:46 am > To: <[email protected]> > > > Personally, I find SPF pretty much useless. Yes, you can use > > it to score some mail, but implementation is not very > > widespread, so you either have to go hard-core and reject, or > > accept the mail anyway, in which case, why bother? > > What's "hardcore" about rejecting mail from addresses that are in > violation of published SPF records? > > Chris > > > -- > ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users > ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ > ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/ -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
