Tony Finch wrote: > On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, W B Hacker wrote: > >>An acl that: >>- acts only on the $domain involved >>- does a list match on multiple $local_part >>- adds a unique header when matched >> >>Along with a router/transport set that: >>- recognizes the special header >>- removes said header >>- delivers to a specific mailstore > > > Urgh, yuck. Why not use an ACL variable? > > Tony.
Simple reason here was that we don't have any left to spare. ;-) (unless Phil bumped from 0-9 to 0-99 when I wasn't looking...) We are already oveloading more of them than we would like to. In any case, what would it gain, code-wise? The $domain conditional and the $local_part / list match workload is the same either way, and the header *can* be left in place for later vetting/analysis, or stats. Once the acl_c/m has been actioned/NOT it goes back in the bit-box for recycling. - it is no longer visible as a header can be. So the header has better after-the fact confirmability. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
