On 8/31/06 6:19 AM, "W B Hacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Greylisting, BTW, is likely to more than double your connection load, (retry
> may 
> be idioticlly rapid for zombies) - spawning child processes that may not go
> all 
> the way through to the DATA phase, but will certainly consume resources.

We run a monitor which, every 5 minutes, queries our greylisting database
for /24 subnets which have sent "too many" messages "recently" deferred by
greylisting.  We (really, "I") look at those--manually, still; the
idiotically rapid retriers among them stand out for their high
blocked_attempts counts and are easy blacklisting decision--blacklisting
keeps them out of greylisting processing.

I don't see all that many.  Much more often I'm late enough to the party
that I see non-retrying zombies (which I blacklist mostly for record-keeping
reasons).  (Our blacklist database allows for either hosts or /24s--a
dynamic IP with an infected machine leads to blacklisting the /24, of
course.)

  --John



-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to