John Robinson wrote: > On 16/09/2006 17:41, W B Hacker wrote: > >> Headers can easily be added at smtp-time in acl's, or at delivery-time >> in router/transport sets. >> >> Ordinarily not much need for Seive or filters for that. > > > But that would be a system-wide configuration,
Not unless you want it to be... > and I want to do this on > a per-user basis. We do per-user threshold comparisons for smtp protocol-violation 'demerits' - and per-user spam threshold settings in ordinary acl's AND - based on results, add selective headers that later determine if a message is put into a specific folder, left alone, or discarded. MAY be replacing the headers with acl_(x) variables. That part not yet tested. Either way - acl. Filter not needed. A 'warn' verb preceding the tests pulls the per-user numbers and puts them into acl_m variables. > Essentially I don't want to foist things on users who > don't want them but I want to do it for my own personal nefarious purposes. > Well 'rational' - not 'nefarious' ;-). >> As far as having Dovecot index the messages as already read, you might >> send them to a folder named 'Read'. >> >> ;-) > > > But they're mailing list messages which deserve to be in the folder for > the list. :-p > 'Spose you could use the list name instead of 'Read'? The right clever code would auto-create new folders for new lists? > It's just my attempt at something like a news program's killfile, but > for email. I want to mark the messages that probably aren't relevant to > me but keep them around for context if necessary. > ACK. Done in Moz MUA here. Easier to alter. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
