Philip Hazel wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, W B Hacker wrote: > > >>>Not true for Exim provided that both the virtual servers are using the >>>same IP address (as you have stated that they are). Independent of the >>>domains, Exim sorts outgoing addresses according to the host lists they >>>route to, and uses a single connection for those that are going to the >>>same hosts (up to the max_rcpt limit, and subject to having the same >>>added headers, rewritten return-path, etc, etc. that is, when the >>>message bodies are identical). >>> >> >>I am sure you are correct about the code, but doubt that conglomeration / >>batching is even operative unless there is enough near-simultaneous >>remote_smtp >>traffic to have accumulate in queue at all. > > > I should have made it clear that what I wrote above applies to ONE > message with multiple recipients. Exim doesn't ever consider multiple > messages together at this level. > >
AH SO! No wonder I was puzzled..... ;-) Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
