Martin Nicholas wrote: > I would of thought a vacation message would be do the least > damage if it came from a blackhole, rather than be a bounce. Bounces indicate > a delivery failure to most mailing systems. > > I'd like therefore to be able to set the return_path to something like: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Default can still be <> which would ensure compatibility. >
So, why bother? Why not emit a customized reject message? - Jeremy -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
