Peter Bowyer wrote: > On 26/09/06, Rob Munsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>- ----- >>>>domain: >>>> driver = domainlist >>>> transport = remote_smtp >>>> route_list = solutionsforprogress.com >>>>dirtybill.solutionsforprogress.com philagrafika.org philagrafika.com byname >>>>- ----- >>> >>>'Someone' doesn't know the correct syntax for a route_list. The docs at >>> >>>http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.62/doc/html/spec_html/ch20.html >> Uh.. noo.. Wrong documentation. If he is working with Exim 3.X, he will have a 'director'. Aside from the obvious error in the 'route list' line (no separators) that looks as if someone tried to use 4.X router syntax blended into a 3.X style 'director'? All the more reason that upgrading will be less work, even in the short run. 3.X support on this list pretty well tailed off about 20 or 30 thousand messages ago. No joke - I have local archives... Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
