On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:14:49AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote: > Chris Lightfoot wrote: > Not tested.... > > - but if the router that handles the spam delivery to the user also has an > 'unseen' with a paired sibling router that sends a copy to, for example, a > comon > storage location (for later analysis of scanning effectveness, ELSE periodic > deletion). > > - and the 'copy' cares not if the user can/has received, as it marches to the > beat of a different drummer.. > > does a bounce get generated when the 'primary' person cannot be delvered to, > but > the 'chained' user-agnostic (always deliverable) router activates and DOES > log a > delivery success? >
I cannot believe this would work. I would imagine that if you use an unseen router, you are effectievly processing 2 messages, (more or less like a fork) each with its own bounce if delivery fails. But I could be wrong. Regards, pdg -- See mail headers for contact information. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
