Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Wednesday 11 October 2006 20:56, gascione took the opportunity to say: > >>The systems are not capable of doing what spamassassin can do. That is why >>we run ClamAV and Spamassassin on Exim servers before delivering the >>messages to the mail systems. The problem with the mail systems is that it >>won't dig down into the header, a bug but no telling if or when it will be >>fixed. That affects the systems ability to filter the SPAM tags we have and >>it impacts the white list functionality which this software does. Driving >>our customers crazy. >> >>received_header_text to nothing? This will do what for me. I can check on >>the Exim on-line to find out where and how to set this up. > > > It will cause no Received: line to be added. If you need your Exim server to > look like it had the IP address of the remote host you'll need something more > elaborate. > >
Depending on where you operate, altering e-mail in such a way as to obscure the backtrail may cause 'something more elaborate' to include need of the services of a damn good lawyer... 'no comment' on whether such laws make sense, should/should not be applicable 'in house', etc. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
