Nigel Metheringham wrote:

> I am proposing to change the list moderation handling - of course the  
> people this *won't* affect are those here, since a list subscriber  
> will not normally get their messages moderated.
> 
> Currently each message that gets put in the moderation queue by  
> mailman generates a moderation message to the moderators (thats  
> basically just me at the moment).  That means I get a personal copy  
> of each spam that hits the list - not a small number of messages per  
> day.  It also means that, during my online hours (basically UK  
> working hours) I tend to respond fairly quickly to legitimate  
> messages that get moderated (very few per day).
> 
> I am intending to change this so that I no longer get immediate  
> moderation notification, or immediate notification of membership  
> status changes (mostly due to bounces).  Instead I will purely work  
> on the daily status reports (I may change these to twice per day).
> 
> At present the majority of my incoming spam load (that avoids the  
> basic filters) is stuff from mailing list moderations.  This is  
> taking up my time and probably meaning I miss some stuff in the mess.
> 
> However the downside of this change is that it may take longer for  
> non-subscriber messages to get through to the list.
> 
> I am not at present planning to move to the far more drastic method  
> of just bouncing mail from non-subscribers - which would break our  
> long standing policy of being open to non-member queries.
> 
> Comments (to the list) welcome.
> 
>       Nigel.

Now and then I get the wrong outbound selected in my MUA and get one of these 
bounces - hasten to the web-page and 'cancel', then repost with the subscribed 
address. I, too have been a moderator-slave.

Given the neatness of that method, the fact that the 'arrivee' *has* an email 
account, the ease and low-cost (!) of subscribing, availability of online 
archives which can easily be searched, I would suggest a few things that could 
perhaps reduce the drudge work further:

1) Add a greatly enhanced 'where and how to subscribe' to both the non-member 
bounce and the web-page it takes one to. Two jobs, one-time each.

2) Couple that with a caveat/incentive ' ...messages from non-members are 
ordinarily reviewed within [ 48 | 72 | ? ] hours...' IOW - sugest that it may 
be 
faster to subscribe than wait, and make it so. Those who begrudge the traffic 
can as easily 'unsubscribe' later...

3) Recruit a few helper-moderators, preferably in different time-zones [1]. 
Same 
notices propagate to each, first one who notices, actions. Only the obviously 
'controversial' ones need delayed or discussed. Very few, I would surmise.

Meanwhile - thanks for all the work you put into providing a very valuable 
resource!

Best,

Bill

[1] Hong Kong/Asia October-May - US/Europe June-September for me.

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to