Marc Perkel wrote: > > Bill Hacker wrote: > >>Marc Perkel wrote: >> >>Hopefully you are 'weighting' the result (we did...), as an all/nothing test >>will otherwise create more than a few FP's, even if adjusted for time delays. >> >>Bill >> >> >> > > > What I'm doing is making sure the verification gives me a solid error > after the rcpt-to: and not before. All other failures don't count > against the message. And I have a noverify list for badly configured > servers. >
Well, let's have a look. Sending you a copy of this 'directly' as well, and betting that it fails sender verification. Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
